Thursday, April 9, 2015

How to get rich in America

 

How to get rich in America. Getting rich in America

By David Hoffman

In America, and indeed in any capitalist society, financial security and material success are normally the primary objectives (some would say the obsessions) of one's life.  As a result, there exists a proliferation of "experts" who allegedly possess the formula to achieving these goals:  Proponents of The Law of Attraction, Positive Thinking, Praying for Prosperity, Self-Hypnosis, Divining the Stock Market, or Investing in Real Estate are more than eager to tell you that riches beyond your wildest dreams await if you just follow a few "simple" steps.

Of course, it should be no surprise that the principal way many of these proponents make their money is by selling products and/or services telling you how to make your money.  You just need to buy their DVDs or Computer Apps, subscribe to their newsletters, or attend their seminars.

Recently, however, the owners of Memories Pizza in Walkerton, Indiana revealed to Americans the true pathway to riches.  In the wake of the recent passage of a controversial Indiana law, known as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)-which many viewed as a veiled license for businesses to discriminate against gays and lesbians, (see Indiana: The State Built on Hate, Pravda.Ru, March 31, 2015)-these owners stated that they not only supported RFRA, they would also refuse to provide catering services at same-sex weddings.

Almost immediately, a fund-raising website was established to support Memories Pizza, and now its owners are on their way to becoming millionaires.  So the moral of the story, ladies and gentlemen, is, thanks to today's Social Media, hard work, education, and skill are no longer the keys to success.  To get rich, all you have to do is utter controversial statements that make national headlines, and then sit back and wait for gullible people to throw money at you in the misguided belief they are supporting some kind of religious "cause."

There are, however, five simple rules you must follow:

1.   Make sure your "cause" has religious overtones.  Trying to raise money from the stance of logic, reason, or even human decency is not enough.  While pictures of starving children, tortured political prisoners, and abused animals can tug at the heartstrings, those emotions are secondary to "legions of Christian soldiers" eager to topple imaginary foes who somehow threaten their "faith."

2.   Don't ask for help with mundane things, like medical expenses.  Many so-called Christians today have forgotten, or chosen to ignore, that annoying "Treat others as you would like to be treated" routine.  Dying because one lacks the money for adequate medical treatment is so passé and routine.  But showing gays and lesbians that your pizza is too good for them-that's the pathway to heaven!

3.   Make sure your donors can pat themselves on the back for supporting your "cause."  Sure, Jesus said that when doing good deeds "your left hand should not know what your right hand is doing."  But where is the fun in that!  Your donors want to be able to look in the mirror and say, "I'm proud of myself for making discrimination a holy virtue."

4.   Give your supporters someone or something to hate, but pretend it's in the name of love.  Nobody wants to admit that hate is the primary motivating factor in human affairs.  Yet one only need look at the campaign methods of politicians to realize that appeals to human goodness rarely, if ever, trump appeals to human evil, as long as that evil is masked with the veneer of religiosity.

5.   Apply a cost-benefit analysis.  Naturally, whenever one utters controversial statements that make national headlines, he or she is certain to attract hostility and harassment.  Just remember that human memories are short.  In a few weeks, or perhaps a few months at most, your words will fade from the national consciousness.  But the money you've made will be yours forever. 

So there you have it-the key to riches in America.  The risk is minimal and the rewards are great.  In fact, the only thing that can obstruct your path is if the world would suddenly become devoid of idiots who use their religion as an excuse to hate.  Of course, that hasn't happened in thousands of years, so what are the odds of it happening now?

David R. Hoffman

Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru

 

Source : english[dot]pravda[dot]ru
post from sitemap

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

America's Radical Oligarchy...of the Rich, by the Rich, and for the Rich

 

America's Radical Oligarchy...of the Rich, by the Rich, and for the Rich. America's Radical Oligarchy

By Will Hart

"In 2011, the top 400 wealthiest Americans have more wealth than half \of all Americans combined..."  (PolitiFact)

 

The dream is over.

America has taken on the character of a Roman Farce, full of irony, black humor and pathos, but there is nothing funny about it.

"The U.S. government now represents the rich and powerful, not the average citizen... When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose."

No, those are not the rants of a disheveled malcontent on the street wearing a Che Guevara T-shirt and waving an anti-Wall Street placard; that quote is taken from a study, published last year, conducted by two prestigious American Universities, Princeton and Northwestern.

Are American's so brainwashed and/or stupid that they fail to realize this? No, many are painfully aware of it. But think of the Soviet Union in its fading days some years before it collapsed.

Would you want to be Alexander Solzhenitsyn then, or on the other hand, Edwin Snowden now?

To get a clearer more detailed picture of exactly how concentrated the wealth of the nation is we turn to some revealing statistics: As of 2010, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 35.4% of all privately held wealth, and the next 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 53.5%,. That means that just 20% of the people owned an astonishing 89%, leaving only 11% of the wealth for the bottom 80% of the population.

The next fact will probably make many Americans twinge and even some of their Euro counterparts as well, but according to a recent report, released by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) the US ranks 4th in the world in terms of the nations with the worst income inequality.

Well, we can take some comfort from the fact that at least it was two spots below its neighbor to the south, Mexico, which came in second.

Americans dazed and confused

This reveals the enormous gap between socioeconomic myth and reality that exists in most of the so-called advanced world especially America. The myths of democratic rule and nearly classless equality are continually promoted by the elite-controlled, mass media, which only creates psychological dissonance among the masses. 

In fact, the rest of the world seems as much like the proverbial deer caught in the headlights, dazed and confused, as many Americans are. What happened to the Promised Land, the Shining City on the Golden Hill the Hope of the world?

Some very strange things took place on the way to the egalitarian New Society; a sharp turn to the right put the country on that old road that leads back to Rome.

Returning to the key point of the study referred to above. The researchers analyzed 1,800 different U.S. policies that were put in place by politicians between 1981 and 2002 to the type of policies preferred by the average and wealthy American, or special interest groups. They found that ordinary U.S. citizens have ZERO influence in Washington DC.

Some recent examples, the people did not support the bank or automaker bailouts, they did not want continuous wars. Obama -- an oligarchy puppet and pseudo- people's president -- has signed on to it all with a big grin. 

He did so and then ramped up military operations while keeping Bush's man at the head of the Department of Defense to continue NEOCON policies, ironically enough. The study clearly shows that the two party- system is a farce, the US is ruled by ONE PARTY and its symbol is $.

The world seems to believe that most Americans go along with all that has been happening for decades by choice. That the voters want the constant wars; that they took the economic meltdowns and financial rape by the New York elites in stride; and also embraced the tax cuts for the rich, etc, etc.

Yes, they appear to be going along, in the way any pacified, disenfranchised population goes along with their domestic rulers, because they have no choice.

There is that nasty little piece of anti-civil rights legislation, The Patriot Act, authored by the rulers and rammed through Congress when the country was in 911-shock.  Then too there is the fact that the police have been militarized, over the past two decades, and taught to treat citizens as the enemy. 

Yes, and we must also include the Homeland Security Administration, given absolute police powers and the NSA, FBI, CIA, and so on as well. What would you do if you were a US citizen under this kind of regime?

There is no viable, organized political opposition that can stand up to this new Oligarchic ruling class. This is not the 1960's or 1970's any such attempt would be immediately dismantled by the domestic, national intelligence network and local police. 

But rather than deal with the well-articulated, yet abstract generalizations offered by academia above, we are going to ask: who are America's ruling oligarchs?

 If the billionaire Koch Brothers, ex-NY mayor Michael Bloomberg and George Soros happened to be Russians, the US media would never fail to call them the oligarchs that they are. But they are never referred to that way, only as 'billionaires'. However, we should expect this because America's mainstream media is owned and controlled by the oligarchy after all.

Nonetheless, before delving into the individuals we need to understand that there are two, interlocking oligarchies 1) the corporate oligopoly and 2) the super wealthy oligarchs. We shall start with the media as an example of how US oligopolies have risen to power in recent decades.

In 1993, 90% of the mass media was owned by 50 companies. That number had dwindled to 6 as of 2014:  General Electric, News Corp, Disney, Viacom, CBS and Time-Warner.  The Big Six own dozens of key subsidiary media outlets including everything from NBC and Universal Pictures to ABC, CBS, the Wall Street Journal, Miramax, Time, CNN, FOX, the list goes on...

In 2011 the Big Six had combined revenues of $276 billion, about equal to the GDP of Egypt. Moreover they control 90% of what Americans read, watch or listen to.

How did this extreme concentration of diverse media outlets occur? Mainly through deregulation and buy outs.

Once legislators were persuaded to deregulate the industry (by the oligarchy) the bigger fish simply ate the smaller ones. Now, at this point there is nothing stopping the process from continuing, so that we may find just three companies completely dominating America's mass media in the future.

As Yahoo gobbled up Warner a few years ago, we may see Google acquire Disney for instance. Whoever controls the media shapes and controls public opinion, defines the national discourse and manipulates public awareness.

The reference to the Roman Empire is more than just metaphor. The facts are disturbing. The data on stratification reveals that America is actually worse than ancient Rome. The 500 wealthiest Roman senators were roughly 10,000 times as rich as the average 'plebe' in the empire, generally a landless farmer or a slave.

In today's America, money buys political offices

Big deal, each of the 500 wealthiest Americans is about 20,000 times as rich as the average person in the bottom 90 percent. If we focus only on financial resources, the average American in the top 500 has 40,000 times the wealth- power of the median citizen.

In Rome wealth and political power went together overtly. Today, in America money buys political offices and therefore the votes of the politicians, but usually quietly through the back door. At least the Romans admitted they were oligarchs, their American descendants try to hide the reality by spinning a tangled web of lies and half-truths.

In addition through PACs and Super-PACS global corporations also spend massive amounts each year influencing the political system through direct Congressional lobbying. 

In this kind of distorted socioeconomic looking-glass world, the ruling class uses the Constitution and Bill of Rights as toilet paper. But they and their minions are careful to pay lip service to the founding documents when in front of TV cameras. Privately they sneer up their sleeves as they hand Jobn Q. Public the new Social Contract in a sealed envelope.

When he opens it, he reads, The Patriot Act...Tax Cuts for the Rich...Debt...Austerity ...Wars, Wars and more Wars

But apologists claim, the US is a democracy and every citizen has a voice when they cast their ballots in elections. Like all the other noble ideals, in the realm, it sounds good in theory but does not work in the real world.

Truth be known, the word democracy never appears in the Constitution or Bill Of Rights, the founding documents that the country's political system is based upon. Like Rome it was designed to be a Republic ruled by the law-making body, the senate, all of whom were among the wealthiest of citizens.

Moreover, the allegedly enlightened founding fathers of America authorized the ownership of slaves; did not allow women the right to vote; and only granted that right to the landed gentry. Those were all key features of the ancient Roman Empire as well.  

America has largely had a sham, representative democracy based on a byzantine electoral system that nobody understands. It has just enough democratic window dressing to fool the public. However, in a true democracy every individual would have one vote; and the people would make the laws, not an elite-controlled Congress.

Be that as it may, money has corrupted the entire process from start to finish. The US Congress serves up the best "democracy" that piles of cash can buy.

Yes, citizens get to cast their vote. But the choices of candidates are determined by $50K a- plate-fundraising dinners, which start long before ordinary people even hear about the candidates or issues that the oligarchs have selected. So what do national elections matter?

Who are America's oligarchs?

The billionaire Koch Brothers ($21.5 billion) and financier George Soros ($11 billion) provide examples of the most overtly, politically active.

David H. Koch was a Libertarian Vice-Presidential candidate in 1980. He ran on a platform that advocated the abolition of Social Security and public schools.  The brothers have formed and/or heavily contributed to numerous conservative think tanks and campaigns.

At a really in 2009, David Koch said "Five years ago, my brother Charles and I provided the funds to start the Americans for Prosperity, and it's beyond my wildest dreams how AFP has grown into this enormous organization."

AFP spent untold millions in 2014 on TV commercials attacking the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as a government boondoggle that "just doesn't work" the campaign slogan told viewers. The group also helped Republicans get elected and take control of congress.

Another organization with ties to the Koch Brothers, Freedom Partners, gave grants worth a total of $236 million to conservative organizations, including Tea Party groups like the Tea Party Patriots.

In July 2012, Koch hosted a $50,000-a-person ($75,000 a couple) fundraising dinner for 2012 Republican Party Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, which was the subject of liberal and progressive protests.

In addition to fundraising, creating and funding conservative think-tanks, Koch Industries and its subsidiaries spent more than $20 million on congressional lobbying in 2008 and $12.3 million in 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group.

Though they claim to be liberterians the Koch brothers answer only to themselves. They act according to self-interest and the interests of their tax bracket, which of course all of the oligarchs share.

Not surprisingly, the Koch's push for tax cuts for rich and for corporations relentlessly and shamelessly, which coincidentally dovetails with the current Republican agenda.

Ex-New York mayor billionaire Michael Bloomberg displayed the ultimate act of oligarchy by simply buying the office. The NY Times reported, "He has now spent more of his own money than any other individual in United States history in the pursuit of public office."

At least he was open and honest about his quest for political power and what he was willing to do to get it.

Oligarch George Soros, a notorious anti-Russian financial derivatives parasite, is more well-known to the Russian leadership and people than to his fellow Americans.  But as journalist Selwyn Duke noted in his article,

"Soros is the invisible hand behind much of the manipulation of our culture.  He reminds me of the evil emperor in Star Wars; his minions are all about bedeviling us, but you don't see him much..." ('George Soros the most evil man in America')

As does its aggressive, foreign-military policy the United States today is the embodiment of the Roman Empire. In this case history has much to say as it did with the British, French and former Soviet Empires, people do much like oligarchies or empires.

But the American leadership is currently deaf, dumb and blind to the mistakes and lessons of history.    

Will Hart

Also read: No American democracy for Americans

Americans, never give up your guns

American capitalism gone with a whimper


Americans: In Obama we don't trust
Source : english[dot]pravda[dot]ru
post from sitemap

App of The Week: iCan Count Money Australia

iCan Count Money Australia is an award winning app that’s been designed to teach kids about money and counting. 

What’s genius about it is the fact that it actually shows Australian money – not American – this is the only money app for kids we discovered that actually does this.

There are six different games within the app that are designed to show all sorts of different counting, maths and money skills. The games cover skills like recognising currency, adding and selecting correct change to pay items, addition and subtraction, and shopping skills.

The Good Bits: In a genius move, the developers of this app have made the music and sound effects within the app mutable - bless them and their regard for parental ears!

We like the wide age range that this app covers.

Preschoolers will be most suited to the “I can catch the coins” game, where they have to simply recognise and tap the coins as they float across the screen. Where older kids can sink their teeth into more complex addition and subtraction with games like, “I can pay in different ways” where they have to pay for things using different coin and note combinations.

We like the animation of the coins and notes – it creates a bit of fun and some hand eye stimulation, as kids have to drag, flip, pinch, rotate and flick coins in order to play.


The Not So Good Bits: Unfortunately the app is only available on iOS devices, and seeing as it’s the only Australian money app on the market – that is kind of a shame.


What It Teaches: The app covers addition, subtraction, counting, money recognition and overall money skills. Using Australian currency means this is actually relevant to Aussie kids and will assist in their recognition of real life money. 


Most Suitable Age Range: The app is designed for preschool age and up.

Tech Info: iOS only

How Much: $3.79

Source : nickjrparents[dot]com[dot]au
post from sitemap

Monday, April 6, 2015

Global powers show their force in Ukraine

Global powers show their force in Ukraine. Ukraine as victim of global powers

By Harun Yahya

Everything began in November 2013 when former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the EU Partnership Agreement. Currently despite the ceasefire signed in Minsk, the guns have not fallen silent in the eastern parts of Ukraine where the death toll is some six thousand people. Now the shadow of a second Cold War has fallen over the region.

Toward a New Cold War?

Recently the U.S. Army sent heavy weapons and military equipment to Lithuania on the Russian border. It was also announced that the U.S. and NATO countries had planned four separate maneuvers in Ukraine, together with bilateral and multilateral maneuvers in Poland and the Baltic countries.

In the face of the developments in the Baltic area, Russia initiated a giant exercise in 19 wide areas with the simultaneous participation of 8,000 troops in bases in Crimea, South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Armenia. Special forces in the Russian Central Military District began a five-day exercise in the region of Sverdlovsk, where more than 600 troops and 300 armored vehicles took part.

In the Black Sea, the missile carrying amphibious ship Bora, the warship Ivanovets and R-109 boats carried out a simulated attack using real rockets. A continuing exercise by NATO warships in the Black Sea at the same time led to a rise in tensions. The message from both sides was clear; 'we are in charge in the region.'

A statement from Moscow while the exercises were going on revealed the full scale of the tension. Putin announced that he was annulling the European Conventional Forces Agreement (ECFA), the most important document signed at the end of the Cold War between Russia and the West.  NATO described this as a worrying development.

Tensions between Russia and the West are again rising to resemble those during the Cold War. Both sides clearly need to take steps to repair the damage without delay. Blocs are forming fast, with the U.S. and the EU countries lining up against Russia.

Sanctions Are No Solution

Experts from the Carnegie Center state that; "Sanctions will create a perception among the Russians that they are under constant pressure from the U.S. This stimulates patriotism and nationalism and also forges a foreign enemy image embodied by America. New sanctions would only solidify this perception and consolidate the government"1. Indeed, the level of support for Putin's policies has risen by 5-10% each month, reaching 88% in October 2014.

The fact is that both the Russians and objective thinkers do not believe that Moscow is seeking to build a new Soviet Empire. Putin regards NATO's Open Door policy as a violation of the promises given to them following the break-up of the Warsaw Pact. The Russians therefore think that Russia has a natural and legitimate right to protect itself and the surrounding area against the plan to surround Russia by way of Georgia, Ukraine and the Baltic countries and to isolate it. In a statement in the early days of the Minsk negotiations, Putin said that their aim was not to wage war but that they would not accept a world order in which the U.S. was the only leader.

The EU countries, being encouraged towards polarization under pressure from the U.S., are aware that prolonging tensions with Russia will wreak serious harm to their own economies. For example Germany, the largest economy in Europe, has more than 6,000 companies doing business with Russia, with investments of more than 20 billion Euros made over the last 20 years. These sanctions are having a serious effect on Germany, the main pillar of the EU economy, as they are on other European countries. Not for nothing did Merkel make intense efforts during the Minsk talks to bring about a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. Merkel was aware of the need to halt the $21 billion losses suffered in the EU countries because of the crisis. It was no surprise that Holland would support Merkel in the talks. France, which ended 2014 in a position of almost zero growth, is currently in the unenviable position of being the sick man of Europe. Replacing the French Economics Minister did not stop France, with the world's fifth largest economy, taking a step back in that ranking. The Dutch demand a relaxation of the sanctions against Russia stemming from its largest oil companies being active in Russia.

On the other hand, European countries are 90% dependent on Russian natural gas. Europe has no way of responding to retaliation by Russia in the form of cutting off natural gas supplies in the long term in the face of the sanctions.

Russia is in turn looked to deepen relations with Asian countries in order to show that it is not dependent on the West. The 30-year natural gas sales agreement signed with China, estimated to be worth some $400 billion, is one outcome of this Russian search for alternative markets. In addition to China, negotiations over new energy projects are also taking place with Egypt and Turkey.

It is therefore expected that Moscow, which is determined to use all the cards it holds  against the sanctions, will not be making concessions on such fundamental issues as Crimea. So it is essential for both sides to take the requisite steps for establishing lasting peace and security while the road is still near. A determination of the position of Ukraine, the main fault line between the two sides, will play a critical role in resolving the crisis. Only an independent Ukraine that is controlled neither by Russia nor by the West, yet that is inclusive of both without excluding either side, and that can play the role of a buffer zone in a temporary process, can unite the two sides on common ground.

The Cold War was of no benefit to anyone. A second Cold War will mean nothing but destruction and disaster, and it is therefore essential for world peace for NATO and Russia to adopt balanced policies of reconciliation.

Harun Yahya

The writer has authored more than 300 books translated in 73 languages on politics, religion and science. He may be followed at @Harun_Yahya and www.harunyahya.com


Will Ukraine build nuclear weapons?
Source : english[dot]pravda[dot]ru
post from sitemap

Sunday, April 5, 2015

Easter 2015: Bring Back Our Girls

Easter 2015: Bring Back Our Girls. 54871.jpeg

For Christians, Easter Sunday celebrates the day when Christ was resurrected from the dead to bring good to humankind; for Moslems, Jesus was saved by God and taken to Heaven. Before these two main religions, Easter was celebrated as a fertility festival, new life, fresh hope and good for all.

So let us remember this day, whether we are Christians, Moslems, Buddhists or even atheists, as a day of universal values, of respect for life, love for our neighbors, the beginning of a new cycle of agriculture, an opportunity to share and live together as a community and to enjoy another year, full of happiness, respect for Mother Earth, our beautiful home, and its residents, ourselves and our brothers and sisters, the other animals we live with.

Most people share these values, whichever side of the geo-political fence they live on, most people respect the common precepts not to kill, not to steal and to help others in need. Some extremist groups do not, and in these I include all terrorist organizations, including Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram (Nigeria), al-Shabab (Kenya), Islamic State, drug and arms traffickers, human traffickers, child abusers... and also NATO.

Where were these precepts of common good when NATO bombed Libya's water supply, then bombed the factory where the pipes were made so that it could not be repaired? Where were these precepts of common good when NATO bombed Libya's electricity grid "to break their backs"? Where were these precepts when NATO used Depleted Uranium in attacks in Kosovo, Serbia and in Iraq? Where were these precepts when NATO fanned the flames in Ukraine and sparked off a horrific conflict which has claimed the lives of some 6,000 officially (and unofficially maybe over 50,000 according to some sources), has uprooted up to a million people and has destroyed countless families? Where were these precepts when Fascists supporting the Putsch government in Kiev committed massacres, forcing the residents of Donbass to protect themselves?

So let us not play the holier-than-thou card and deride the acts of terrorist groups, which in many cases are the reaction to western actions, let us not exonerate NATO from its crimes, let us not exonerate Israel for strafing schools with white phosphorous or its hypocrisy over Iran's nuclear energy program, when Israel sits on what in the Negev Desert? Let us also not exonerate the terrorist groups from the horror they bring to innocent people.

Among these horrific and cowardly acts was the kidnapping almost one year ago (April 14*) of over 270 girls (some say over 300) from the Chibok Government Secondary School in northern Nigeria by Boko Haram. Around 230 of these girls are still missing, having been forced to convert to Islam, having been forced to marry Boko Haram members or having been sold as working or sexual slaves.

Among these horrific and cowardly acts is the recent massacre of around 150 students in Garissa University, Kenya but among these horrific and cowardly acts are NATO's tactics using drones in a negligent fashion which murders civilians and takes out targets in one and the same breath, NATO's coward-in-the-sky tactics bringing freedom and democracy to complex societies from 30,000 feet, and Israel's massacre of civilians whenever a rocket is fired at a settlement.

They are all terrorist acts, they are all to be condemned equally. Under the common values celebrated at Easter, it is as (un)justifiable to say one act of murder is more justifiable than another as it is to say "my God is better than yours".

The way forward is not armed conflict and therefore why doesn't someone get serious about the trafficking of weaponry? Where did Islamic State get its weapons from, for example? Why did the West callously stand by why Islamic State was forming, why did they invade Iraq and create the conditions for such a movement to exist?

The way forward is development and education over deployment and extremism. With education comes hope, with education comes the freedom to develop, with education comes real freedom and democracy, the choice to decide, the freedom to decide what to do and where to live. This is a globalized world of collective human values, values which represent the same precepts Humankind has respected for thousands of years.

How come just a few spoil the work of the many around the world who spend their time helping others? Let me close with the alleged words of Senator John McCain, who used this column to launch insults against President Putin last year, forgetting the President's popularity rating is close to 90 per cent, namely that making peace with Iran is limiting the ability to bomb it.

I rest my case. May those who try to ruin our lives through instigation to commit, or acts of, wanton violence (and here I differentiate between violence and the right to self-defense) rot in Hell for eternity.

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Pravda.Ru

(timothy.hinchey@gmail.com)

 

*Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey has worked as a correspondent, journalist, deputy editor, editor, chief editor, director, project manager, executive director, partner and owner of printed and online daily, weekly, monthly and yearly publications, TV stations and media groups printed, aired and distributed in Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, East Timor, Guinea-Bissau, Portugal, Mozambique and São Tomé and Principe Isles; the Russian Foreign Ministry publication Dialog and the Cuban Foreign Ministry Official Publications. He has spent the last two decades in humanitarian projects, connecting communities, working to document and catalog disappearing languages, cultures, traditions, working to network with the LGBT communities helping to set up shelters for abused or frightened victims and as Media Partner with UN Women, working to foster the UN Women project to fight against gender violence and to strive for an end to sexism, racism and homophobia. He is also a Media Partner of Humane Society International, fighting for animal rights.

 

(*)

Readers can follow the Bring Back Our Girls campaigns on Twitter and Facebook

 

 

Source : english[dot]pravda[dot]ru
post from sitemap

Friday, April 3, 2015

Social costs of capitalism destroy Earth's ability to support life

Social costs of capitalism destroy Earth's ability to support life. Earth: Planet of garbage


by Paul Craig Roberts

I admire David Ray Griffin for his wide-ranging intelligence, his research skills, and for his courage. Dr. Griffin is not afraid to take on the controversial topics. He gave us ten books on 9/11, and anyone who has read half of one of them knows that the official story is a lie.

Now Griffin has taken on global warming and the CO2 crisis. His book has just been published by Clarity Press, a publisher that seeks out truth-telling authors. Griffin's book is a hefty 424 pages plus 77 pages of footnotes documenting the information that he presents. Unprecedented: Can Civilization Survive The CO2 Crisis? is no screed. The book is a carefully researched document.

Readers often ask me to write about global warming, chemtrails, vaccines, and other subjects beyond my competence. However, I can see that Griffin has made a huge investment in researching climate change. His book provides a thorough account under one cover.

Also read: The pros and cons of GM food

Mankind doomed without GM food

When is it time for genetically modified humans?

Griffin concludes that civilization itself is at stake. His evaluation of the evidence is that humans have about three decades to get CO2 emissions under control, and he sees hope in the agreement between Obama and Chinese president Xi Jinping that was announced on November 11, 2014.

Griffin argues that instead of rushing to their own destruction like lemmings, the human race must accept the moral challenge of abolishing the fossil-fuel economy. He makes the case that clean energy permits most of modern society's way of life to continue without the threat posed by ever rising emissions.

Nuclear energy is not among clean energy sources-just look at the ongoing radiation pollution from Fukushima. Griffin is correct in the way he has framed the issue. It is a moral challenge.

Clearly the climate is changing, whether caused by CO2 emissions or some other cause. Every day brings more reports of perils associated with climate change. See for example here and here.

The planet is being polluted with many forms of wastes.

Our foods are also polluted. On one hand our food is polluted with herbicides and on the other hand by antibiotics. And then we have hormones and pesticides. The World Health Organization has concluded that the glyphosate in Monsanto's Roundup, a herbicide widely sprayed on GMO food crops, is a likely causes of cancer in humans and animals

Glyphosate, which is also believed to be exterminating honey bees and Monarch butterflies, is now present in 75 percent of air and rain samples. Some time ago I reported on a microbiologist who wrote to the US Secretary of Agriculture about extensive findings by independent scientists that glyphosate has serious adverse effects on animal life and on animal and human fertility and on the ability of soil to produce nutrition in food crops. The scientist pointed out that the US government's clearance of glyphosate rested entirely on the industry's own studies of its safety and that these "studies" are not substantiated by independent scientists. He pointed out that not only are the studies done by scientists employed by Monsanto, but also many agricultural science university faculties are dependent on research funds from the chemical industry and thereby do not have an independent voice.

Also read: Our dangerously dirty cities

US and Chinese space garbage may soon fall on your head

Water crisis to strike Earth in 2025

(On a French TV show a Monsanto representative claimed Roundup was safe enough to drink, but turned down the offer from the show's host to demonstrate by drinking a glass by exclaiming "I'm not stupid!")

Martha Rosenberg writing in CounterPunch reports that 70 percent of all antibiotics are fed to livestock because it produces weight gain and saves money on feed costs. Ninety-three percent of doctors are concerned about the meat industry's excessive use of antibiotics, and independent scientists have definite evidence that the growing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics is due to the use of antibiotics as animal feed.

Scientists at the University of Iowa found Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 70 percent of farmed hogs. A Consumer Reports investigation found that US meat, regardless of the meat's source, is full of "pathogens, commensals, and antibiotic resistant bacteria." Pork tested contained five resistant bacteria strains.

The Food and Drug Administration, severely weakened by Republicans, cannot stand up to Big Meat. Rosenberg reports that "when the FDA tried in 2008 to ban farm use of cephalosporins (antibiotics like Cefzil and Keflex) because they are needed for pneumonia, strep throat, and other serious human conditions, the egg, chicken, turkey, milk, pork, and cattle industries and the animal Health Institute stormed Capital Hill."

Congress responded to the campaign donations, not to the health and safety of the American people. The Animal Health Institute consists of the drug companies who make profits selling 70 percent of their production to meat, egg, and milk producers. The members of the "health" institute are Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Elanco/Lilly, Merck, Boehringer, Ingelheim Vetmedica, Novartis, etc.

In other words profits come far ahead of public health. As the drug companies have more or less stopped the development of new antibiotics, the protection antibiotics provide against infections is rapidly fading.

The horror goes on. During a time of severe drought in the western US, with California reportedly left with one year's supply of water, the fossil-fuel fracking industry is polluting the remaining surface and ground water.

Also read: Earth working on Apocalypse for mankind

Lake Baikal turning into swamp because of alien algae

How to feed 7 billion people to keep Earth alive?

All of these activities-use of antibiotics as animal feed, use of GMO herbicides, fracking-are profitable because they impose huge external costs on the environment and on third parties who are not participants in the profits gleaned by externalizing the costs of production. And this brings us back to Griffin's important book.

Griffin makes the point that the external cost imposed on the climate by fossil-fuel use is the source of the life-threatening crisis that humanity confronts. Capitalists make money by exploiting labor and by externalizing the costs of the wastes produced by the productive process by imposing the wastes on the environment. It is the short-term time horizon of production organized by selfish private interests focused on quarterly profits that is destroying the livability of the earth.

Almost every economist on earth will rise up in opposition to that true statement, because they are brainwashed in the neoliberal ideology that masquerades as economic science, but in fact is nothing but an apology for capitalist exploitation of labor and the earth.

I happened to be one of Ronald Coase's graduate students the year he published his famous article on "The Problem of Social Cost" (external costs) for which, together with his article, "The Theory of the Firm," he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics. In theory, externalities can be internalized into the process of production so that the producer bears all the costs if all inputs and waste products are subject to property rights. But no one owns the atmosphere, the oceans, the rivers and streams. They remain "common property" and thus are dumping grounds for waste disposal.

Governments, despite pressure from corporations, have realized that pollution is a problem, and governments have imposed some regulation. The regulation raises some costs to corporations, but the regulation is insufficient to halt very much of the externalization of the cost of production. In economic terms, this is the crisis that David Ray Griffin presents to us.

Capitalism's pursuit of profit is destroying life on earth.

Paul Craig Roberts 

www.paulcraigroberts.org

 


Tired of Earth? Escape to Mars.
Source : english[dot]pravda[dot]ru
post from sitemap

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

The Boys from Brussels

The Boys from Brussels. EU as Fourth Reich

By Hans Vogel

Many will remember the movie "the Boys from Brazil," about a group of nazis surviving in South America and plotting to regain the influence they lost when World War II ended. Indeed, there is increasing evidence that a number of high-ranking nazis did find refuge in South America (as they did in the US). However, all talk of the nazis surviving in South America has blinded us to a most glaring fact: nazis are alive and kicking, but not in South America. No, I am not talking here of Marine Le Pen and other politicians that the "Western" press likes to call far right or even fascist.

The real nazis are to be found in the offices of the European Commission in Brussels. As a matter of fact, the members of the European Commission have refined and perfected the tools of their notorious predecessors in Berlin. While the first nazi regime (the "Third Reich") lasted a mere 12 years (out of the projected one thousand), it was in fact no more than an organizational chaos headed by an absolute ruler whose grip on day-to-day matters was far from complete. The Fourth Reich in Brussels has already far outlived its predecessors in Berlin, because it has chosen a more efficient and vicious form of government, borrowed from the former Soviet Union. Essentially it is a government by ruthless, heartless bureaucrats, the so-called Eurocrats. Here we have a Fourth Reich that is essentially a nazi state, run by a Soviet-style politbureau, the European Commission. The current Führer is a Pole called Tusk. The Fourth Reich is a nazi (or fascist) state, because it is actually controlled by powerful private enterprise: the big banks and large corporations.

The private individual in Europe, usually referred to as "taxpayer," "consumer" or even sometimes "citizen," has absolutely no influence on what goes on in Brussels. If you want to know how the average European feels about the "European Union" and what he thinks of the policies dictated by the "European Commission," just listen to him as he desperately cries out to get the attention of those Commission members. Just listen to him: in Madrid he demands "bread, work, a house and dignity;" in Dublin he complains about the government hiking to price of an access to drinking water; in Rome, he begs for job security and decent wages; in Greece he begs just to be left in peace. Even in Brussels, under the very noses of the Commission, there are demonstrations of desperate citizens clamoring for compassion, like this past Saturday, 29 March. But no one ever listens. On the contrary, the Commission members just continue their policies, claiming them to be in the "general interest." 

Take, for instance, Cecilia Malmström, one of the "Boys from Brussels." She is the Commissioner for Trade, hell-bent on pushing through the nefarious TTIP-agreement with the Washington regime. In her previous capacity of Commissioner for Home Affairs, Mrs. Malmström has sold out the security of Europeans by handing over all their private data to the Washington regime, the world's leading rogue state.

Giving Mrs. Malmström the benefit of the doubt, I recently approached her official spokespersons with some questions regarding the TTIP negotiations. Having read on the official EC website: "in the 21st century it is anachronistic that Europeans and Americans still impose customs duties on each other's products. These should be eliminated, quickly and completely," I asked Joseph Waldstein (an Austrian) and Daniel Rosario (a Portuguese) why it would be "anachronistic" to impose customs duties. Surely, I asked, there must be a thoroughly researched and documented position paper on the basis of which such an apodictic statement was made. Really, EC-President Juncker (who is quoted here) says no more than "it is about time to have free trade with the US."

However, I never received an answer from La Malmström's private court. She obviously is well-protected. Her boy Waldstein first asked me "which outlet" I was working for. When I answered Pravda.Ru, he reacted by indicating that "the EC spokesperson's service deals with media queries." It does not surprise me the EC does not regard Pravda.Ru as press, for apparently in order to be considered press in the Fourth Reich, one needs to carry full government approval. Just like in the Third Reich. No difference here.

It will not come as a surprise that there is no position paper, no research, no analysis of the possible effects of free trade with the US, not the faintest idea of how free trade with the US will affect the lives of Europeans. Apparently in the Fourth Reich, policy is as whimsical and haphazard as in the Third Reich. No difference, here, either.

Of course, no one in the EC will answer serious questions by non-compliant writers. They have no time for reflection because they are in a hurry. La Malmström and her lackeys are busy clearing the way for the flooding of the European market with poisonous junk from the US and from US corporations. Monsanto, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and McDonald's must be allowed to carry on their chemical warfare against Europeans.

Who will protect Europeans from traitors like La Malmström? This woman is a real danger and wherever she goes, she leaves a trail of destruction and misery. I bet that after stepping down as Commissioner La Malmström will be rewarded by her US masters and probably be made Member of the Board at Monsanto, GSK or McDonald's. 

Hans Vogel

Opinions of the author may not coincide with the views of Pravda.Ru editors

Source : english[dot]pravda[dot]ru
post from sitemap